The Possibility of Introducing the Euro in the Countries of Central and Eastern Europe

Main Article Content

Viktor Hámoros

Abstract

The introduction of the euro has been one of the most significant steps in the economic integration within the European Union, with twenty Member States having adopted it at different times. The enlargement of the euro area has taken place under varying conditions, due to a series of economic crises and reforms, among which the fulfilment of the convergence criteria is of particular importance. Although widely assumed economic benefits such as accelerating growth and inflation stability are associated with the introduction of the euro, literature suggests that the reality is more nuanced: neither the pace of economic growth nor inflation dynamics show a clear correlation in the countries adopting the euro. With regards to inflation, it is particularly important, that despite some assumptions, accession has in practice not led to significant price increases. The convergence of price levels towards the euro and the dollar is also discussed, which is significant for the CEECs, except for Slovenia. The article also refers to a US economic narrative that the rigidity of the euro may hamper economic adjustment. In the context of the possibility of Hungary joining the euro area, it is argued that membership of the currency area alone does not guarantee sustainable economic convergence. The advantages and disadvantages of accession can vary considerably depending on country-specific factors, reform capacity and economic policy strategy. Therefore, further up-to-date research would be needed if Hungary were to reconsider joining the euro area. In the latter case this would be particularly important, especially in the current European economic and political context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hámoros, Viktor. 2025. “The Possibility of Introducing the Euro in the Countries of Central and Eastern Europe”. Current Social and Economic Processes / Jelenkori Társadalmi és Gazdasági Folyamatok 20 (2):157-67. https://doi.org/10.14232/jtgf.2025.2.157-167.
Section
Study of social and economic systems

References

2004. évi XXX.sz. törvény az Európai Unióhoz történő csatlakozásáról szóló szerződés kihirdetéséről.

Armingeon, K., Baccaro, L. (2012): Political economy of sovereign debt crisis: the limits of internal devaluation. Industrial Law Journal, 41, (3): 254–275. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dws029

Ball, L. (2014): Long term damage from the Great Recession in OECD countries. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 11 (2): 149–160.

Blyth, M. (2013): Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

Comission of the European Communities–Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs (1990): One market, one money. In: Comission of the European Communities–Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs. European Economy, No 44. Comission of the European Communities. Brüsszel. 9.

Dimitrios, A., Keith P, Iuliana T. (2021): The impact of corruption, economic freedom, regulation and transparency on bank profitability and bank stability: Evidence from the Eurozone area. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 184 (1): 150–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.08.023

European Central Bank. (2024): The international role of the euro. https://doi.org/10.2866/501734

European Central Bank. (2025): ECB staff macroeconomic projections for the euro area. European Central Bank, Frankfurt am Main. https://doi.org/10.2866/4153746

European Central Bank. (2025): Economic Bulletin issue 2. <https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/economic-bulletin/html/eb202502.en.html> (2025.04.12.)

European Investment Bank (2025): Growth and competitiveness in Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe: The role of innovation. European Investment Bank, Luxembourg. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep66308.5?seq=1> (2025.03.29.)

Fabio, M. (2018): Challenging the Euro: a view from the United States. Rivista di Studi Politici Internazionali, 85 (1): 57–76. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/26540653> (2025.03.29.)

Fareed, Z., Abdur Rehman, M., Adebayo, T. S., Wang, Y., Ahmad, M., Shahzad, F. (2022): Financial inclusion and the environmental deterioration in Eurozone: The moderating role of innovation activity. Technology in Society, 69 (101961): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101961

Filip L., Paul K. (2023): The Euro and Price Convergence in Central and Eastern Europe. International Journal of Central Banking, 19 (1): 341–343, 362-363.

Gottfried P. (2021): Gondolatok az euro magyarországi bevezetése időzítésének dilemmájáról. Hitelintézeti Szemle, 20 (3): 110–126. https://doi.org/10.25201/HSZ.20.3.110126

Guillén, M., Pavolini, E. (2015): Welfare states under strain in Southern Europe: overview of the special issue. European Journal of Social Security, 17. (2): 147–157.

Heins, E., de la Porte, C. (2015): The sovereign debt crisis, the EU and welfare state reform. Comparative European Politics, 13 (1): 1–7.

Johannes D., Peter S.B. (2020): Inflation and Euro Membership. Journal of Economic Integration, 35 (2): 264–266, 275–276. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2020.35.2.264

Matsaganis, M. (2013): The Greek Crisis: Social Impact and Policy Responses. Friedrich-Ebert Stiftung, Berlin. <https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/508a/90615256866d6548d6ae49d893b86c9768ec.pdf> (2025.03.29.)

Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic–Czech National Bank (2023): Assessment of the Fulfilment of the Maastricht Convergence Criteria and the Degree of Economic Alignment of the Czech Republic with the Euro Area. Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic and the Czech National Bank, Prága. <https://www.cnb.cz/export/sites/cnb/en/monetary-policy/.galleries/strategic_documents/maastricht_assessment_2023.pdf> (2025.03.29.)

Pavolini, E., León, M., Guillén, M., Ascoli, U. (2016). From austerity to permanent strain? The European Union and welfare state reform in Italy and Spain. In: La P., La E. (szerk.): The sovereign debt crisis, the EU and welfare state reform. Palgrave Macmillan. London. 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58179-2_6

Perez, A., Matsaganis, M. (2018): The political economy of austerity in Southern Europe. New Political Economy, 23 (2): 192–207.

Petmesidou, M., Glatzer, M. (2015): The crisis imperative, reform dynamics and rescaling in Greece and Portugal. European Journal of Social Security, 17 (2): 157–180.

Petros, E. (2021): Has the Euro Promoted Eurozone’s Growth? Journal of Economic Integration, 33 (2): 1–4, 19. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2018.33.2.1389

Philip R., Arianna T. (2022): How the Eurozone disempowers trade unions: the political economy of competitive internal devaluation. Socio-Economic Review, 20 (1): 323–350. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwaa021

Ricardo G:, Ana P. (2024): Adopting the euro: A synthetic control approach. European Journal of Political Economy, 83 (1): 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2024.102537.

Sacchi, S. (2015): Conditionality by other means: EU involvement in Italy’s structural reforms in the sovereign debt crisis. Comparative European Politics, 13 (1): 1–16.

Sacchi, S. (2018): The Italian welfare state in the crisis: learning to adjust? South European Society and Politics, 23 (1): 29–46.

Simonyi P., Illés S., Zsótér B., Rapkay B. (2013): Local economic development in the Hungarian countryside: the heritage of paternalism. Central European Regional Policy and Human Geography, 3 (2): 41–53.

Slavi, S. (2019): Exchange Rate Regimes in Central, Eastern, and Southeastern Europe: A Euro Bloc and a Dollar Bloc? Journal of Economic Integration, 34 (3): 395–398, 424. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/26756451> (2025. 04.01.)

Sofia, P. (2019): Export or Perish: Can Internal Devaluation Create Enough Good Jobs in Southern Europe? South European Society and Politics, 24 (2): 259–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2019.1644813

Williem D. (1998): Europe and the Euro. The World Today, 54 (11): 284-285. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/40476102> (2025.03.28.)